Week 1

Starts this Saturday

RC GILLS
1 Crawley Town v Coventry (Backing Crawley Town @ 1.93)
2 Gillingham v Colchester (Backing Gillingham @ 2)
3 Peterborough v Swindon (Backing Peterborough @ 1.91)
4 Port Vale v Brentford (Backing Brentford @ 2.12)
5 Bury v Chesterfield (Backing Bury @ 2.69)

5-Folds
SelectionsOdds*StakePotential win
1,2,3,4 and 5 42.33 £5.00 £206.65

1 Derby v Blackburn (Backing The Draw @ 3.22)
2 Nottm Forest v Huddersfield (Backing Nottm Forest @ 1.7)
3 Middlesbrough v Leicester (Backing The Draw @ 3.1)
4 Leeds v Brighton (Backing Leeds @ 2.41)
5 Birmingham v Watford (Backing Watford @ 2.33)
5-Folds
SelectionsOdds*StakePotential win
1,2,3,4 and 5 96.22 £5.00 £476.10

This is what pisses me off about the betfair multiple prices.

Watford are a minimum of 6/4 with EVERY bookie and 2.54 on betfair and yet I get a shitty 2.33 on this thing. How the hell does that work?

Middlesbro Leicester draw is better than that price with EVERY bookie (as big as 5/2). 3.45 on the betfair market. 3.1 on this shitty thing.

Bizarre.

We're working on different odds here :

Prices available on the multiple button
MK Dons 2.14
Wolves 2.44
Derby 1.83

Scottish soccer isn't even there ffs.

Working the other way and comparing normal betfair odds to these multiples:

Crawley are 2.08
Gills are 2.2
Peterbro 2.04
Brentford 2.3
Bury 2.98

Every one bigger on the normal screen compared to the multiple screen.

What worries me most ....well, "worry" is a bit too strong a word.... what strikes me about this is we're playing a competition where people are using different odds to other people and that can't be right.

It needs sorting Yorkie.

We should be using standard odds from a chosen bookie. That way the historic odds are available for anyone to see and check if they think anyone has made a mistake and posted up the wrong odds.

I can see that Carlisle were 13/10 to beat Orient with Coral on the 17th of July for example, just by clicking a button.

Where is the downside to that?

1 Bristol City v Bradford (Backing Bradford @ 3.55)
2 Walsall v Tranmere (Backing Walsall @ 2.16)
3 Rochdale v Hartlepool (Backing Hartlepool @ 3.06)
4 Southend v Plymouth (Backing Plymouth @ 3.12)
5 Bournemouth v Charlton (Backing Bournemouth @ 2.14)

5-Folds
SelectionsOdds*StakePotential win
1,2,3,4 and 5 157.8 £5.00 £784.00

Seems like everyone is doing it right so all good, Onedunme the odds on multiples are slightly less than they are backing them in the daily lists its not my fault they lower the odds on sides in those lists blame them

1 QPR v Sheff Wed (Backing QPR @ 1.65)
2 Reading v Ipswich (Backing Reading @ 1.72)
3 Leeds v Brighton (Backing Leeds @ 2.43)
4 Nottm Forest v Huddersfield (Backing Nottm Forest @ 1.7)
5 Utrecht v Go Ahead Eagles (Backing Utrecht @ 1.58)

5-Folds
SelectionsOdds*StakePotential win
1,2,3,4 and 5 18.75 £5.00 £88.75
*Odds shown are indicative and may vary. More info

I'll type this slowly because some of you are obviously finding what I'm saying very difficult to understand (you fucking retards)

It's not fucking working. Some people are typing up odds straight from betfair and others are using the multiple copy and paste

Why am I taking the trouble to copy and paste this:
1 Derby v Blackburn (Backing The Draw @ 3.22)
2 Nottm Forest v Huddersfield (Backing Nottm Forest @ 1.7)
3 Middlesbrough v Leicester (Backing The Draw @ 3.1)
4 Leeds v Brighton (Backing Leeds @ 2.41)
5 Birmingham v Watford (Backing Watford @ 2.33)
5-Folds

W
When I could just be posting up better odds straight from the normal betfair site. These were the odds at the same time as I posted last night:
Derby x 3.6
Forest 1.82
Boro x 3.45
Leeds 2.66
Watford 2.54

Scottish football isn't even on the multiples so are all Scottish games banned for the purpose of this comp' then? Only English, Dutch, Belgian and Japanese leagues is it?

And yes Yorkie, I am blaming you because you're the idiot who won't change the rules.

Any body else out there still too fucking dumb to understand what I'm saying, let me know and I'll try typing it out again.